<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>eLessons Learned</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ellblog.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ellblog.com</link>
	<description>An ediscovery best practices blog, written by law students.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 15:02:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>When deactivating your Facebook account becomes the intentional destruction of evidence</title>
		<link>http://ellblog.com/when-deactivating-your-facebook-account-becomes-the-intentional-destruction-of-evidence/</link>
		<comments>http://ellblog.com/when-deactivating-your-facebook-account-becomes-the-intentional-destruction-of-evidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Catherine.Kiernan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Document Custodians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eLessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In-House Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outside Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discoverability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Production of Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spoliation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ellblog.com/?p=4156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Deactivating your Facebook account and passively allowing it to be permanently deleted can be considered the intentional destruction of evidence.  The Plaintiff in Gatto is now facing a potentially damaging adverse jury instruction if he takes his case to trial.  In Gatto, a ground operations supervisor at JFK Airport was injured in his course of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ellblog.com/when-deactivating-your-facebook-account-becomes-the-intentional-destruction-of-evidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Photogrammetry for the Win!… If you know what it does.</title>
		<link>http://ellblog.com/photogrammetry-for-the-win-if-you-know-what-it-does/</link>
		<comments>http://ellblog.com/photogrammetry-for-the-win-if-you-know-what-it-does/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 15:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris.Borchert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Defendants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eLessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Experts/Independent Contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Officials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Admissibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Experts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ellblog.com/?p=4146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Federal Rules of Evidence (“FRE”) are notorious for their complication. Hearsay Rules continue to astound attorneys across the country. Now, in a more modern era, we have the advanced electronics capable of aiding the evidentiary process in many ways. But with a jury of lay people, it is difficult to describe the use of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ellblog.com/photogrammetry-for-the-win-if-you-know-what-it-does/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Privileged Communications Have to Actually be Privileged to be Immune</title>
		<link>http://ellblog.com/privileged-communications-have-to-actually-be-privileged-to-be-immune/</link>
		<comments>http://ellblog.com/privileged-communications-have-to-actually-be-privileged-to-be-immune/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 15:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris.Borchert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[eLessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In-House Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outside Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upper Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discoverability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privilege]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Production of Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work-Product Doctrine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ellblog.com/?p=4140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The brief order by the First Department Appellate Division doesn’t delve into much background (or really any background at all) as to the facts of the present case, however, it does shed some light on discovery matters. The prior order had directed the plaintiff to turn over a certain e-mail as part of the discovery, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ellblog.com/privileged-communications-have-to-actually-be-privileged-to-be-immune/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blocking Statutes Watch Out &#8211; U.S. Courts Coming Through…</title>
		<link>http://ellblog.com/blocking-statutes-watch-out/</link>
		<comments>http://ellblog.com/blocking-statutes-watch-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris.Borchert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[eLessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In-House Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outside Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discoverability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Production of Data]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ellblog.com/?p=4136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just because your adversary makes a request for documents that would violate German law, it doesn’t mean you are not required to do so. In AccessData Corp., the plaintiff made several discovery requests, including a request for a production of documents, which encompassed the production of third-party personal information. The defendant objected to the request [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ellblog.com/blocking-statutes-watch-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hath No Fury Like A Scorned Employer: Using Discovery As A Weapon</title>
		<link>http://ellblog.com/hath-no-fury/</link>
		<comments>http://ellblog.com/hath-no-fury/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris.Borchert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Document Custodians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eLessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In-House Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Technology Professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outside Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discoverability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Production of Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanctions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ellblog.com/?p=4130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lawyers love playing “the game”: the passive-aggressive chess match of paperwork requests and time-stall battles with the opposing attorney. At first glance, botched production can look like sloppy lawyering, but in reality it can be a brilliant move in disguise. In this case, Independent Marketing Group is suing for breach of fiduciary duties, breach of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ellblog.com/hath-no-fury/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is What You Post On Facebook Discoverable? The Answer Is… Maybe.</title>
		<link>http://ellblog.com/is-what-you-post-on-facebook-discoverable-the-answer-is-maybe/</link>
		<comments>http://ellblog.com/is-what-you-post-on-facebook-discoverable-the-answer-is-maybe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 15:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Catherine.Kiernan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[eLessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In-House Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outside Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Admissibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discoverability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privilege]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ellblog.com/?p=4125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We often hear that we should be careful about what we post on the internet.  But no matter how many times we hear this good advice, it seems like we have all posted something on the internet that we later regret.  Unfortunately, the internet is not a forgiving place.  And these unwanted internet posts can [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ellblog.com/is-what-you-post-on-facebook-discoverable-the-answer-is-maybe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York Court Adopts Federal Standard Regarding Initial Costs of ESI</title>
		<link>http://ellblog.com/new-york-court-adopts-federal-standard-regarding-initial-costs-of-esi/</link>
		<comments>http://ellblog.com/new-york-court-adopts-federal-standard-regarding-initial-costs-of-esi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 15:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Catherine.Kiernan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[eLessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In-House Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outside Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Owners/Executives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cost Sharing & Shifting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Production of Data]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ellblog.com/?p=4122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In February 2012, the New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, held that the cost of finding of producing electronically stored information (ESI) is placed initially on the party producing the discovery request.  While this decision is consistent with New York’s longstanding rule that discovery requests are to be paid by the responding [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ellblog.com/new-york-court-adopts-federal-standard-regarding-initial-costs-of-esi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Are Trade Secrets Not Trade Secrets?</title>
		<link>http://ellblog.com/when-are-trade-secrets-not-trade-secrets/</link>
		<comments>http://ellblog.com/when-are-trade-secrets-not-trade-secrets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Catherine.Kiernan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Defendants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eLessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In-House Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outside Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Admissibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confidentiality Agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Production of Data]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ellblog.com/?p=4118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When are trade secrets no longer allowed to be kept secret?  According to the Southern District of New York, when you try to obtain a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order in federal court you also appear to waive your right to trade secrets. In Barr Laboratories, Kos Pharmaceuticals filed a motion for a preliminary [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ellblog.com/when-are-trade-secrets-not-trade-secrets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>eDiscovery Etiquette: Who Should Pick Up the Check?</title>
		<link>http://ellblog.com/ediscovery-etiquette/</link>
		<comments>http://ellblog.com/ediscovery-etiquette/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 16:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris.Borchert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[eLessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In-House Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outside Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cost Sharing & Shifting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Production of Data]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ellblog.com/?p=4109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Electronic Discovery requests can pose substantial financial burdens for the parties to a lawsuit.  According to the New York County Supreme Court, these costs are the responsibility of the party who is required to produce the e-discovery.  However, there are a few exceptions to this general rule, including discovery requests that present an undue burden [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ellblog.com/ediscovery-etiquette/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter Turnover: If you tweet in the woods, and no one hears it, does it make a sound?</title>
		<link>http://ellblog.com/twitter-turnover/</link>
		<comments>http://ellblog.com/twitter-turnover/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 16:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris.Borchert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Defendants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eLessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Service Provider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discoverability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Production of Data]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ellblog.com/?p=4104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you tweet, it’s the same as though you screamed your message out of the window. On October 11, 2011, the defendant in this case was charged with Disorderly Conduct for allegedly marching on the Brooklyn Bridge.  In connection with the Disorderly Conduct charge, New York sent a subpoena to Twitter in order to see [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ellblog.com/twitter-turnover/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
