March 19, 2009
Citation: Nat’l Economic Research Assocs., Inc. v. Evans, LECG Corp., 21 Mass. L. Rptr. 337 (Mass. Super. Ct. Aug. 3, 2006).
e-Lesson Learned: If a company wishes to read an employee’s emails to his attorney sent through his personal Yahoo e-mail account through the Internet, albeit on a company-provided laptop, it must clearly tell the employee that: (1) all such e-mails are stored on the hard disk of the company’s computer in a temporary file, and (2) the company expressly reserves the right to retrieve and read such files.
Want to read employees’ personal Yahoo emails? Then tell them! (in Writing, of course)
The use of a personal e-mail account on an employer-issued computer presents challenges for both employers and employees. An employee who uses a web-based e-mail service to communicate with his lawyer does not waive attorney-client privilege in those emails just because they are automatically (and unbeknownst to him) copied to his company-owned laptop computer when he views them.
Continue reading »
4 Comments |
More...
|
Permalink
Tagged as: Accessibility, Admissibility, Computer Forensics Protocols, Privilege, Production of Data, Work-Product Doctrine
View more articles implicating: Information Technology Professionals
January 30, 2009
Citation: Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Washington v. Executive Office of the President, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99511 (D.D.C. 2008)
Employee/Employer Implicated: Leader of the Free World (i.e., Executive Office of the President); other government agencies; information technology managers
e-Lesson Learned: Not all records management systems are created equal. Electronic records management systems often appear to be very thorough in their cataloging, storing, and retention of electronic information, such as emails. However, when certain federal statutes set specific record retention requirements which must be followed by government agencies, the records management system currently in place may not satisfy the statutory requirements.
In Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Washington v. Executive Office of the President, the plaintiff was a government ethics watchdog. CREW, as the organization is called, sued various government organizations, including the Executive Office of the President (yes, that President, George W. Bush), for an alleged failure to recover, restore, and preserve electronic communications created and/or received within the White House in violation of the Federal Records Act and their failure to establish an electronic records management system that complies with FRA. The defendants in the case moved to dismiss the case on several grounds, each of which the court rejected. That means that if nothing else, a lawsuit for violation of the Federal Records Act can survive and move forward.
Continue reading »
2 Comments |
More...
|
Permalink
Tagged as: Accessibility, Computer Forensics Protocols
View more articles implicating: Employees, Government Officials, Information Technology Professionals
January 28, 2009
Citation: Qualcomm, Inc. v. Broadcom Corp., No. 05-CV-1958-B, 2008 WL 66932 (S.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2008)
Employee/Employer Implicated: In-house counsel and retained attorneys, as well as anyone involved in the oversight of legal action or proceedings
e-Lesson Learned: Make sure that your company has a clear case review and discovery protocol to ensure that attorneys working for you have the proper guidance. If you are involved at any level of the litigation process, from in-house counsel to lead trial attorney to junior associate, you are always responsible to act ethically in the work that you do for your company.
Attorneys long to be described in print as having an “impressive education,” “extensive experience,” and being “talented” and “well-educated.” However, when those words appear in a court opinion enumerating your ethics violations during a cover-up, they don’t ring as sweet.
Continue reading »
No Comments » |
More...
|
Permalink
Tagged as: Accessibility, Computer Forensics Protocols, Discoverability, Good Faith, Procedure, Production of Data, Sanctions
View more articles implicating: In-House Counsel
January 23, 2009
Citation: Qualcomm, Inc. v. Broadcom Corp., No. 05-CV-1958-B, 2008 WL 66932 (S.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2008)
Employee/Employer Implicated: Everyone, from management to individual employees to in-house counsel to independent contractors
e-Lesson Learned: During discovery, make sure you and your employees give attorneys complete access to company email records, guiding them towards the accounts of relevant employees and offering helpful search terms that relate to the matter at hand.
Let’s say you download an e-book of Aesop’s Fables to look for the story “The Milkmaid and Her Pail.” You think of search terms and come up with: milkmaid, pail, count, chickens, hatched. Then what? If you want to find the story, you do the search. However, if you’re pretty sure the story is there but you don’t really want to find it, you might search other terms. Well, as Qualcomm found out, the second option doesn’t work so well when it comes to discovery.
Continue reading »
No Comments » |
More...
|
Permalink
Tagged as: Accessibility, Computer Forensics Protocols, Discoverability, Good Faith, Production of Data
View more articles implicating: Employees, Experts/Independent Contractors, Owners/Executives, Upper Management
January 8, 2009
Citation: Peskoff v. Faber, 251 F.R.D. 59 (D.D.C. 2008)
e-Lesson Learned: Make all reasonable efforts to preserve relevant data for pending or reasonably anticipated litigation, and if you can’t, be prepared to explain why. This includes having a data management protocol in place for managing the routine maintenance and deletion of data, stopping automated maintenance mechanisms and hiring experts to handle the preservation of relevant data at first notice of potential litigation, and performing a thorough search of discoverable data on the first attempt.

I’m only a semester into law school. In fact, I haven’t even received a grade yet. But I can still tell when a client has destroyed all hope of winning his or her case. In the civil action of Peskoff v. Faber, the defendant shot himself in the foot with the starting gun.
Continue reading »
5 Comments |
More...
|
Permalink
Tagged as: Computer Forensics Protocols, Cost Sharing & Shifting, Production of Data, Spoliation
View more articles implicating: Owners/Executives