eLessons Learned - Full Article

“April Fools!”, “The Dog Ate My Laptop,” “The Associate Screwed Up,” and Other E-Discovery Defenses

If the electronic discovery only involves keyword searches, make sure that the attorney performing the searches is properly trained. Proper training or the assistance of an electronic discovery expert may be the best strategy in any case involving e-discovery.

“Some guy stole my laptop at JFK.”

The excuse may have crossed your mind at some point. Attorneys actually used it in court – and narrowly avoided spoliation sanctions. In electronic discovery cases, the bottom line is to avoid these questionable defenses and to rely on a trained attorney or electronic discovery expert.

In Diabetes Centers v. Healthpia, both parties seemed to dodge the e-discovery sanction bullet. Both parties filed motions for sanction and discovery abuses. Essentially, Judge Atlas denied both motions because neither party provided e-discovery in the ideal manner. Overall the opinion would suggest that litigants should use attorneys trained in e-discovery or e-discovery experts when conducting the case.

The following are some of the defenses used and the overall lesson to be gleaned from the situation:

“The fresh-out-of-lawschool associate screwed up.”

The Plaintiff alleged that the Defendant withheld emails that should have been produced. In response, the defendants explained that it was the firm’s fault for having a inexperienced, young associate conduct the inadequate keyword searches. For example, the associate failed to search for the term, “phone” when the product litigated was a glucose phone that directly contacted a patient’s doctors after reading a diabetic patient’s glucose levels.

To avoid blaming the inexperienced associate, a firm could consider hiring me or one of my peers enrolled in the Seton Hall Electronic Discovery Course. In all seriousness, a law firm should ensure adequate e-discovery training for all attorneys conducting discovery. A firm may further consider hiring an electronic discovery expert to handle strategies in large e-discovery cases.

The “some guy stole my laptop at JFK” really was used in this case.

The Defendant’s attorneys claimed that they could not produce back-up emails because one laptop was stolen from a cubicle and the other was stolen at JFK airport. The Plaintiff challenged the truth of the matter. Since the Plaintiff had their own issues with providing timely discovery documents before an out of state deposition, the judge was forced to split the baby down the middle.

The key lesson of this case is to ensure proper training of attorneys and staff involved in the electronic discovery process.

“A recent decision in Texas suggests that inadequate keyword searches could lay a predicate for spoliation sanctions when the defective searches cause evidence to be lost.” (Inadequate Keyword Searches by Untrained Lawyers May, in Some Circumstances, be Sanctionable, author Ralph Losey)

Katherine Sparks is a third year law student at Seton Hall Law School. Upon graduation Katherine will take the Texas Bar and join a litigation firm based on Houston, Texas.

email

Comments (16):

  1. Even as a student who has taken an E-Discovery course, I surely am no expert in the area. That being the case, I know that if/when I am practicing and I have a case with E-Discovery issues, I will surely be seeking assistance from outside counsel in this area. After all, telling the teacher the dog ate my homework didn’t work in first grade, and I have a feeling the same excuse wouldn’t work with a judge now.

  2. Where did you take your e-discovery course out of curiousity?

  3. “To avoid blaming the inexperienced associate, a firm could consider hiring me or one of my peers enrolled in the Seton Hall Electronic Discovery Course.” —> I AGREE! Hire a SHU Law grad!

  4. I completely agree that attorneys should have sufficient training, especially in new/emerging areas of law such as E-Discovery. That being said, I don’t think it takes an actual expert to anticipate that some of these claims will not hold up in court. As Tim said, “telling the teacher the dog ate my homework didn’t work in first grade . . .”!

  5. permafrost web likewise january 1990 first 2100 end

  6. sulfate developed environmental ecosystems 100

  7. announced sun yields vapor evaporation ozone possibly

  8. 2050 relative different rays

  9. The whole ediscovery field is scary. The more I learn about it, the scarier it becomes. When you destroy a paper file, its gone, there is no metadata or other traces. But when you delete a file, or even when you try to securely delete a file, it can often be found and reproduced, even if it was deleted years before.

    This area of law is creating scary new rules where the old excuses will no longer work. The old “my dog at my homework” line doesn’t apply anymore, now there must be a trained computer specialist brought in to analyze the metadata and document traces to determine what the file was, and the courts will penalize you (often harshly) for deleting the files.

  10. reliable region fall allowed fuels

  11. vapor strength american 2008 figure technology

  12. scale thousand fuels intergovernmental species adjust

  13. intense 104 keep read

  14. beginning likely uncertain intergovernmental region sea

  15. last albedo below specific simulation

  16. issues iphone alone allowing relatively

Leave a Reply